SAN DIEGO. A recent letter to Congress reveals that The National Institutes of Health (NIH) gave EcoHealth Alliance a $3.7m grant to experiment how a bat coronavirus can emerge in humans. The world continues to experience the dire consequences of what they say in writing is a “limited experiment.” Public information long overdue recently emerged detailing the NIH project called, “Understanding the risk of Bat coronavirus emergence.”

NIH admits that EcoHealth Alliance collaborated with the CCP’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) lab. This joint effort with a near peer adversary produced what can only be called a bioweapon of pandemic proportions, used to control global populations. A newfound progress report attached to the letter offers the secret science in detail of the 5-year grant period (2014-2019). It proves COVID19 was not an accident.

“We used the genetic codes of some of the other viruses we found in bats and inserted the spike protein genes of those viruses (the proteins that attach to cells) into the cultured viruses. By doing this experiment we showed that other viruses may also be able to infect [ACE2 receptor] human cells.”

The progress report was submitted to Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance  on August 03, 2021.

“We also showed that some of these viruses cause SARS-like illness in mice that are adapted to have similar cell surface receptors to people. This work proves that there is a clear and present danger for future emergence of novel SARS-like viruses in people.”

America’s Health and Human Services NIH agency accuses Daszak of breaking its reporting rules when conducting the bat coronavirus research.  In the process, NIH admits to its lies. Yet backs off as a source for the COVID 19 pandemic.

The lies produced untold destruction as they go long and deep. To this day, Dr. Francis Collins and Dr. Anthony Fauci adamantly defend ‘either zero or no percentage worth mentioning gain-of-function in the research.

“I will repeat again — the NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain-of-function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Fauci told the Senate in May.

Now, NIH attempts to remove language on gain-of- function off its website.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) wrote,  “What does the NIH have to hide?”

The NIH letter blows the facts open.

NIH’s principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak sent a letter  dated October 20, 2021 to Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a member of the Committee of Energy and Commerce.  It was clear, saying,

“The research plan was reviewed by NIH in advance of funding, and NIH determined that it did not to fit the definition of research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP) because these bat coronaviruses had not been shown to infect humans.”

A final progress report for the study funded by Grant R01AI110964 to EcoHealth, is attached to the letter. It includes data from the research project using naturally-existing bat coronavirus genome sequences for gain-of-function to humans. 

“The limited experiment described in the final progress report provided by EcoHealth Alliance was testing if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”

Richard Ebright, professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University, told the Washington Examiner the new NIH letter is a “bombshell.”

Ebright added: “The NIH’s acknowledgment of the facts is new, but the facts themselves are not new. The NIH was informed about the gain-of-function research in Wuhan in 2018 and again in 2020. Collins and Fauci lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public.”

NIH then shocks with this denial,

“The analysis attached confirms that the bat coronaviruses studied under the EcoHealth Alliance grant could not have been the source of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic,” concludes NIH.

Finally a five-year experiment emerges from the shadows.

The 72-page report attached to Rep. Rodgers letter details the opposite of what Fauci and NIH defends.

The reporting period from June 2018 through May 2019 is very detailed and scientific. The scientific language is hard follow. Yet certain things are very clear, like the goals of the gain-of-function experiment. The test subjects are listed as “Humans” on the cover page.

It also lists the performance sites, which are EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan Institute of Virology, and East China Normal University.

It’s important to carefully read Specific Aim 3.

From the report under major goals of the project:

Specific Aim 3: Testing predictions of CoV inter-species transmission. We will test our models of host range (i.e. emergence potential) experimentally using reverse genetics, pseudovirus and receptor binding assays, and virus infection experiments in cell culture and humanized mice….we will assess potential for each isolated virus and those with receptor binding site sequence, to spill over.

We will do this by sequencing the spike (or other receptor binding/fusion) protein genes from all our bat-CoVs, creating mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2 [human], CD26/DPP4 (MERS-CoV receptor) or other potential CoV receptors.

We will then use receptor-mutant pseudovirus binding assays, in vitro studies in bat, primate, human and other species’ cell lines, and with humanized mice where particularly interesting viruses are identified phylogenetically, or isolated.

Also in the report was the fifth year study of rural residents in Southern China, used to find increased bat coronavirus spillover potential. Again, natural coronavirus in bats are not known to infect humans. Therefore – Fauci and the CCP’s secret diabolical quest ensued to alter natural bat disease viruses. Yet, NIH says they didn’t expect ePPP pandemic potential?

Why then surveil Chinese people enrolled in test trials? 

They were already on the bat to human emergence train, barreling down the tracks.

From the progress report page four,

“We conducted a cross-sectional biological behavioral surveillance in Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guangdong provinces from 2015 to 2017. From 8 study sites, a total of 1,596 residents were enrolled… After the interviews, 1,497 participants provided biological samples for lab analysis.

Bat coronavirus seropositivity were detected in human population in four sites in this study.”

For example, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein seropositivity occurs as a result of vaccination or infection. It amounts to immunologic evidence.

So, the Experimenters found people in Southern China exhibiting symptoms of  an unusual illness having severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) and Flu-like illness. Guangdong and Guangxi respondents reported ‘unusual illness’ symptoms in greater percentages (51.9% and 51.3%, respectively). How did these poor people get sick?

The report links the sickened people to proximity with animals, specifically bats. Yet, how can that happen when bat to human coronavirus transmission did not exist before NIH/EcoHealth’s “limited experiment.” However, a number of Chinese subjects had markers of seropositivity in blood samples for bat coronavirus (page 5 progress report).

These gain-of-function experiments created a dangerous human variant of the bat disease. COVID’s ugly face rose up in China before December 2019. One anonymous business traveler said he contracted an illness in China that remained undiagnosed. How many others wondered and stumped doctors? Had the pandemic begun before anyone knew it? Experimenters kept driving to re-invent nature and mess with virus DNA as it all unfolded in nightmarish proportions.

The hard reality lives in the progress report.

“In year four, we performed preliminary in vivo infection of SARSr-CoVs on transgenic mice that express hACE2.

Mice were infected with 105 pfu of full-length recombinant virus of WIV1 (rWIV1) and the three chimeric viruses with different spikes…These results demonstrate varying pathogenicity of SARSr-CoVs with different spike proteins in humanized mice.”

“In year five, we continued with in vivo infection experiments of diverse bat SARSr-CoVs on transgenic mice expressing human ACE2.

Mice were infected with 4 strains of SARSr-CoVs with different S protein, including the full-length recombinant virus of SARSr-CoV WIV1 and three chimeric viruses with the backbone of WIV1 and S proteins of SHC014, WIV16 and Rs4231, respectively. ” 

Only 2 of 8 mice infected with rWIV1-SHC014 S survived, therefore making that strain the most lethal.

These people knew how lethal bat coronaviruses were way before we did. Infected people lived and worked outside of the Wuhan area and a local wet market.

EcoHealth has five days from Oct. 20th to submit to NIH any and all unpublished data from the experiments and work conducted under the million-dollar grant.

Denials make everything worse.

It is unbelievable NIH and EcoHealth Alliance, let alone China deny accountability in starting the COVID-19 pandemic. China seeks to control the world. They found a way.

Play with fire  and you end up with COVID 19 killing nearly five million people. NIH did not identify (or held back) the genetic sequence of this highly- contagious man-made pathogen. They only compare it to other identified bat viruses that are similar.

“RaTG13 is one of the closest bat coronavirus relatives to SARS-CoV-2 collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” NIH says, trying to backtrack on COVID 19 culpability from their “little experiment.”

 Some Americans believe they are the experiment now for COVID m-RNA vaccinations and are “part of a political hoax,” says one social media  commentator.

Senators like Rand Paul want these experimenters to come clean. The pandemic continues to be  riddled with lies and dishonesty about how all it began and everyone behind it.  How can you trust ‘the shot’ that is supposed to stop the virus NIH didn’t expect to infect the planet?  Does NIH really know the long-term potential of their trans-species virus? What are we really injecting into our bodies to stop this still mysterious genome of death and sickness?

They tell us “to trust the science?” Right.

###